How should members handle disputes during a meeting?

Prepare for the Georgia HOSA Statesman Award Test. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations to ensure success. Excel in your exam!

Members should seek intervention from the Chair when handling disputes during a meeting because the Chair is responsible for maintaining order and ensuring that discussions are productive. The Chair is trained to facilitate conversations and mediate conflicts, allowing for a structured resolution process. This approach promotes a respectful dialogue and helps to maintain a professional atmosphere in the meeting.

In contrast, arguing until consensus is reached can lead to further conflict and disrupt the flow of the meeting. Ignoring the disagreement does not resolve the issue and can foster resentment among members. Voting to silence a speaker undermines the principles of open communication and can create an environment of fear or intimidation, which is counterproductive to team dynamics. Overall, involving the Chair provides a constructive path forward and helps ensure that all voices are heard in a respectful manner.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy